Download Resources - English
- nrc_toolkit_04_go-nogo-checklist-in-relation-to-counterterrorism-measure....pdf
- nrc_toolkit_05_criteria-for-calculating-risk-impact-and-likelihood.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_06_example-risk-matrix.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_07_example-counterterrorism-policy.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_08_example-nsag-engagement-policy-considering-counterterrori....pdf
- nrc_toolkit_09_partnership-assessment-checklist.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_10_me-minimum-standards.pdf
- Toolkit for Principled Humanitarian Action: Managing counterterrorism Risks (full Toolkit PDF)
- nrc_toolkit_01_risk-categories-and-operational-impacts.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_02_examples-of-counterterrorism-clauses.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_03_reviewing-counterterrorism-clauses.pdf
- Practical guide: Project cycle management and counterterrorism risks
Download Resources - French
- nrc_toolkit_08_example-nsag-engagement-policy-considering-counterterrori....pdf
- nrc_toolkit_09_fr_partnership-assessment-checklist.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_10_fr_me-minimum-standards.pdf
- Toolkit for Principled Humanitarian Action: Managing counterterrorism Risks (full Toolkit PDF)
- nrc_toolkit_01_ar_risks-and-operational-impacts.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_02_examples-of-counterterrorism-clauses.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_03_fr_reviewing-counterterrorism-clauses.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_04_fr_go-nogo-checklist-in-relation-to-counteterrorism-measures.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_05_criteria-for-calculating-risk-impact-and-likelihood.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_06_example-risk-matrix.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_07_example-counterterrorism-policy.pdf
Download Resources - Arabic
- Toolkit for Principled Humanitarian Action: Managing counterterrorism Risks (full Toolkit PDF)
- nrc_toolkit_01_ar_risks-and-operational-impacts.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_02_ar_examples-of-counterterrorism-clauses.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_03_ar_reviewing-counterterrorism-clauses.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_04_ar_go-nogo-checklist-in-relation-to-counterterrorism-measures.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_05_ar_criteria-for-calculating-risk-impact-and-likelihood.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_06_ar_example-risk-matrix.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_07_ar_example-counterterrorism-policy.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_08_ar_example-nsag-engagement-policy-considering-counterterrorism-risks.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_09_ar_partnership-assessment-checklist.pdf
- nrc_toolkit_10_ar_me-minimum-standards.pdf
Toolkit for principled humanitarian action: Managing counterterrorism risks
5. Resources
This section contains the risk library, downloadable resources and definitions of acronyms and key terms.
Downloads
English
Toolkit for Principled Humanitarian Action: Managing counterterrorism Risks (full Toolkit PDF)
- Tool 1: Risk Categories and Operational Impacts
- Tool 2: Examples of Counterterrorism Clauses
- Tool 3: Reviewing Counterterrorism Clauses
- Tool 4: Go-NoGo Checklist in Relation to Counterterrorism Measures
- Tool 5: Criteria for Calculating Risk Impact and Likelihood
- Tool 6: Example Risk Matrix
- Tool 7: Example Counterterrorism Policy
- Tool 8: Example NSAG Engagement Policy Considering Counterterrorism Risks
- Tool 9: Partnership Assessment Checklist
- Tool 10: M&E Minimum Standards
Practical guide: Project cycle management and counterterrorism risks
French
Toolkit for Principled Humanitarian Action: Managing counterterrorism Risks (full Toolkit PDF)
- Tool 1: (FR) Risk Categories and Operational Impacts
- Tool 2: (FR) Examples of Counterterrorism Clauses
- Tool 3: (FR) Reviewing Counterterrorism Clauses
- Tool 4: (FR) Go-NoGo Checklist in Relation to Counterterrorism Measures
- Tool 5: (FR) Criteria for Calculating Risk Impact and Likelihood
- Tool 6: (FR) Example Risk Matrix
- Tool 7: (FR) Example Counterterrorism Policy
- Tool 8: (FR) Example NSAG Engagement Policy Considering Counterterrorism Risks
- Tool 9: (FR) Partnership Assessment Checklist
- Tool 10: (FR) M&E Minimum Standards
Arabic
Toolkit for Principled Humanitarian Action: Managing counterterrorism Risks (full Toolkit PDF)
- Tool 1: (AR) Risk Categories and Operational Impacts
- Tool 2: (AR) Examples of Counterterrorism Clauses
- Tool 3: (AR) Reviewing Counterterrorism Clauses
- Tool 4: (AR) Go-NoGo Checklist in Relation to Counterterrorism Measures
- Tool 5: (AR) Criteria for Calculating Risk Impact and Likelihood
- Tool 6: (AR) Example Risk Matrix
- Tool 7: (AR) Example Counterterrorism Policy
- Tool 8: (AR) Example NSAG Engagement Policy Considering Counterterrorism Risks
- Tool 9: (AR) Partnership Assessment Checklist
- Tool 10: (AR) M&E Minimum Standards
Risk library
International Council of Voluntary Agencies (ICVA), 2020
‘Risk and Humanitarian Culture: An ICVA Briefing Paper’
Christian Aid, 2019
‘The Grand Bargain and the issue of Risk Management’
https://www.grandbargain4ngos.org/upload/Grand_Bargain-_Risk_workshop_5d160710dd4ef.pdf
Human Security Collective, 2019
‘Derisking and Civil Society: Drivers, Impact and Solutions’
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), 2019
‘International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts – Recommitting to Protection in Armed Conflict’
InterAction, and Humanitarian Outcomes, 2019
‘NGOs & Risk: Managing Uncertainty in Local-International Partnerships’
https://www.interaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Risk-Global-Study.pdf
InterAction, 2019
‘Resources on NGO Risk Management’
https://www.interaction.org/topics/ngo-risk-management/
The Cash Learning Partnership (CaLP), 2019
‘Cash and Voucher Assistance and Risk in Financial Management and Compliance Briefing Note’
The New Humanitarian, 2019
‘The creeping criminalisation of humanitarian aid’
https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/news/2019/06/07/creeping-criminalisation-humanitarian-aid
U4 Anti-Corruption, and Transparency International, 2019
‘Managing corruption challenges in humanitarian settings’
https://www.u4.no/publications/managing-corruption-challenges-in-humanitarian-settings.pdf
Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG) and Overseas Development Institute (ODI), 2018
‘Counter-terrorism, bank de-risking and humanitarian response: a path forward’
https://www.odi.org/publications/11177-impact-bank-de-risking-humanitarian-response-syrian-crisis
HPG, and ODI, 2018
‘The impact of bank de-risking on the humanitarian response to the Syrian crisis’
https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/12376.pdf
Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC), 2018
‘Principles under Pressure: the impact of counterterrorism measures and preventing/countering violent extremism on principled humanitarian action’
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), 2018
‘Bridging the Emergency Gap’
https://arhp.msf.es/sites/default/files/BRIDGING-THE-EMERGENCY-GAP-FULL-REPORT.pdf
NRC and United Nations Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), 2017
‘Presence and Proximity - To Stay and Deliver, Five Years On’
https://www.nrc.no/presence-and-proximity-to-stay-and-deliver-five-years-on
Charity and Security Network, 2017
‘Financial Access for US Non-Profits'
https://www.charityandsecurity.org/system/files/FinancialAccessFullReport_2.21%20(2).pdf
Chatham House, 2017
‘Recommendations for Reducing Tensions in the Interplay Between Sanctions, Counterterrorism Measures and Humanitarian Action’
Harvard Law School Program on International law and Armed Conflict (HLS PILAC), 2017
‘Pilot empirical survey study on the impact of counterterrorism measures on humanitarian action’
http://blogs.harvard.edu/pilac/files/2017/03/Pilot-Empirical-Survey-Study-2017.pdf
MSF, 2017
‘Perilous terrain. Humanitarian action at risk in Mali’
https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Case-Study-03-Mali-ALTA_0.pdf
Geneva Call, 2016
‘In their words: Perceptions of armed non-state actors on humanitarian action’
https://www.genevacall.org/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2016/09/WHS_Report_2016_web.pdf
Global Public Policy Institute (GPPi), and Humanitarian Outcomes, 2016
‘The effects of insecurity on humanitarian coverage’
https://www.gppi.net/media/SAVE__2016__The_effects_of_insecurity_on_humanitarian_coverage.pdf
HLS PILAC, 2016
‘Understanding humanitarian exemptions: U.N Security Council Sanctions and Principled Humanitarian Action’
http://blogs.harvard.edu/pilac/files/2016/04/Understanding_Humanitarian_Exemptions_April_2016.pdf
Humanitarian Outcomes, and InterAction, 2016
‘NGOs and Risk: How international humanitarian actors manage uncertainty’
https://www.humanitarianoutcomes.org/sites/default/files/publications/ngo-risk_report_web.pdf
Humanitarian Outcomes, and InterAction, 2016
‘Residual Risk Acceptance: An advocacy guidance note’
Humanitarian Outcomes, 2016
‘What It Takes: Principled pragmatism to enable access and quality humanitarian aid in insecure environment’
Humanitarian Outcomes, ODI and Humanitarian Practice Network (HPN), 2016
‘Tug of War: Ethical decision-making to enable humanitarian access in high-risk environments’
https://odihpn.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/NP80-web-string.pdf
Humanitarian Outcomes, and InterAction, 2016
‘NGO Risk Management: Principles and Promising Practice’
https://www.humanitarianoutcomes.org/sites/default/files/publications/ngo-risk_handbook.pdf
HLS PILAC, 2015
‘Suppressing Foreign terrorist fighters and supporting principled humanitarian action’
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2673502
NRC, 2015
‘Risk Management Toolkit: In relation to counterterrorism measures’
https://www.nrc.no/resources/reports/nrc-risk-management-toolkit-2015/
Humanitarian Outcomes (2014-2016)
‘Secure Access in Volatile Environments’
https://www.humanitarianoutcomes.org/projects/save
Harvard Law School, 2014
‘An Analysis of Contemporary Counterterrorism-related Clauses in Humanitarian Grant and Partnership Agreement Contracts’
MSF, 2014
‘Where is everyone? Responding to emergencies in the most difficult places’
https://www.msf.org/sites/msf.org/files/msf-whereiseveryone_-def-lr_-_july.pdf
HPG, and ODI, 2013
‘Paradoxes of presence: Risk management and aid culture in challenging environments’
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/global-insecurities/migrated/documents/paradoxes.pdf
NRC, and OCHA, 2013
‘Study of the Impact of Donor Counter-Terrorism Measures on Principled Humanitarian Action’
https://www.unocha.org/sites/unocha/files/CounterTerrorism_Study_Full_Report.pdf
Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research (HPCR), 2011
‘Humanitarian Action under Scrutiny: Criminalizing Humanitarian Engagement’
OCHA, 2011
‘To Stay and Deliver’
https://www.unocha.org/sites/unocha/files/Stay_and_Deliver.pdf
Global NPO Coalition on Financial Action Task Force (FATF)
Report Collection
List of Acronyms
AML: Anti-Money Laundering
CaLP: The Cash Learning Partnership
CHS: Core Humanitarian Standard on Quality and Accountability
CTF: Counter Terrorism Financing
CVA: Cash Voucher Assistance
DFID: Department for International Development
DTG: Designated terrorist group
EU: European Union
FATF: Financial Action Task Force
FDFA: Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs
IASC: Inter-Agency Standing Committee
IHL: International humanitarian law
INGO: International Non-Governmental Organisation
M&E: Monitoring and evaluation
NGO: Non-governmental organisation
NMFA: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
NPA: Norwegian People’s Aid
NPO: Non-profit organisation
NRC: Norwegian Refugee Council
NSAG: Non-state Armed group
OCHA: Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
OFAC: Office of Foreign Assets Control
OFSI: Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation
PCM: Project cycle management
PVS: Partner Vetting System
UK: United Kingdom
UN: United Nations
UNSC: United Nations Security Council
US: United States
USAID: United States Agency for International Development
Key Terms and Definitions
A single globally accepted definition does not necessarily exist for each of the terms below, and organisations use some of them differently. The definitions given here are for the purpose of this toolkit only.
Access — Humanitarian organisations’ ability to reach affected populations, provide humanitarian assistance andthe ability of affected populations to access assistance.
Anti-diversion policies and practices — Measures to ensure that humanitarian assistance reaches the intended beneficiaries.
Code of conduct — A set of principles adopted by an organisation designed to maintain standards of behaviour.
Counterterrorism measures — International, regional, national and donor instruments and policies related to counterterrorism
DTG — A group or organisation that has been listed as terrorist by a government pursuant to its national law or by an international body pursuant to international law.
Due diligence — The implementation of an organisational policy and controls designed to assess and track how an organisation’s activities and relationships affect its humanitarian work throughout the project cycle.
Evaluation — A learning process intended to systematically assess the efficiency, effectiveness, relevance, sustainability and impact of an activity, project or programme. Evaluations focus on assessing outcomes rather than outputs.
Fraud — A deception practised to secure unfair or unlawful gain.
Monitoring — The continuous and systematic oversight of the implementation of an activity, which is used to measure the achievement of objectives using allocated funds.
Residual risk – The risk that remains after efforts to manage or mitigate risks.
Risk - The effect of uncertainty on an organisation’s objectives.
Risk management — The coordinated activities to direct and control an organisation with regard to risk.
Risk transfer – The shifting of risk from one organisation or group onto another. Risk transfer can occur between donors and humanitarian organisations, between international organisations and local implementing partners, and between headquarters and field-based staff.
Sanctions — Restrictions imposed by one or more countries upon another country for political reasons. They may take many forms, including economic and targeted sanctions.
Vetting — The action conducted by an organisation to check whether prospective partners, contractors or staff members appear on designated terrorist lists such as those maintained by donor governments, host governments or bodies such as the UN or EU.